I want to believe: some myths about the management of industrial safety - Mines Paris Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Cognition, Technology and Work Année : 2014

I want to believe: some myths about the management of industrial safety

Résumé

There are many definitions of safety, but most of them are variations on the theme that safety can be measured by the number of adverse outcomes and must be enforced by using more of the same safety measures (e.g. more procedures). What the industry thinks safety is and how it can be achieved are both questionable. This article looks at six safety-related assumptions, or safety myths, which can be found across most industry practices. These myths are related to human error, procedure compliance, protection and safety, root causes, accident investigation and 'safety first'. We argue that while relying on such myths makes safety management easier, they also make it flawed and ineffective. Therefore, we propose a critical discussion leading to a set of managerial messages. In this paper, we present the six myths in sequence and then discard them through the analysis of various industrial examples. We then replace the myths with six clearer statements in order to build an alternative view of safety.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Besnard-Hollnagel-2014.pdf (437.66 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Dates et versions

hal-00720270 , version 1 (02-03-2015)

Identifiants

Citer

Denis Besnard, Erik Hollnagel. I want to believe: some myths about the management of industrial safety. Cognition, Technology and Work, 2014, 16 (1), pp.13-23. ⟨10.1007/s10111-012-0237-4⟩. ⟨hal-00720270⟩
251 Consultations
1175 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Mastodon Facebook X LinkedIn More